So I’m just reblogging it for the link, but…am I the only who finds this both kek and smh?
Black people riot, burn down parts of their own cities, and everyone in the media is all: “We have to give voice to the voiceless, their lives matter, this is a natural response to all the violence they face.”
And as soon as some white people get together who do not self harm, but rather want a better life for their people, get together peacefully it’s all: “WE HAVE TO STOP THE RACIST MONSTERS! GET OUT THERE AND BEAT THEM BACK INTO THE SHADOWS! SHOW THESE DEGENERATE MONGRELS THERE IS NO PLACE FOR THEIR KIND IN SOCIETY!!!!!!”
I am unfamiliar with the source personally, although it was shared elsewhere by people I trust. I knew of the Soldiers of Odin but had not looked into American Vikings Clothing.
Son of Hel 
You’re probably not the only one, but I don’t find it either of those things. There’s no equivalence between racists and victims of racism.
LikeLike
please explain? Because it sounds like you’re saying that because one group experiences “racism” they should be allowed any action in protest even if those actions would be called “racialized terrorism” if another group did it, and because one group is “racist” it is perfectly acceptable to…treat them with behaviors that would be considered racist were it in regards to any other group.
Or am I misunderstanding you?
LikeLike
I’m saying that oppressed people have a moral right to revolt against their oppressors (in my system of morality, at any rate), and that the converse is not only untrue, but meaningless.
LikeLike
(It may help if I mention that I am, amongst other things, Voduisant, so this is for me an inevitable religious stance as well as a political one.)
LikeLike
You stance seems predicated that a group experiencing racism cannot themselves be racist. However, racism is the belief that one’s people are superior to another group or all groups of other peoples. One’s position in the social hierarchy of a society does not dictate one’s inability to believe that one’s people are the superior people, even if they are a “suppressed/oppressed” people as well.
So if we go with your moral system, where in the “oppressed” have the duty and moral right to revolt…then these “white supremacist” groups have as much, if not more, right to revolt than do any in the Black community like those presently leading the BLM charge and it’s destructive actions. After all, white supremacy is suppressed in all its forms, any white person who shows the slightest amount of pride in their race/heritage is ostracized instantly from society at large, and any collection of such people can expect to be violently attacked simply because of who and what they are (this being the guiding definition of what oppression actually appears to be). And since these “white supremacist” groups are oppressed and violently attacked based solely on the basis of their race…then they are the victims of racism and have a moral right to revolt…according to your stated beliefs.
which leaves me one again shaking my head and laughing at the very obvious double standard that is being applied to demonize a peaceful gathering while praising a multitude of violent riots…all based on nothing more than the skin color of who is doing the actions.
LikeLike
Please explain?
Because it sounds like you’re saying that it’s okay for the one group to engage in violence and terror because “They suffer” but that it’s wrong for another group to engage in non-violent get together because “people like them caused suffering.”
or am I misunderstanding you?
(double posted comment, website error)
LikeLike
“While Nordic Heathenry and Havamalism may not be the most logical and natural choice for some people, and should not be viewed universally as such, I would propose that a person with any amount of European DNA could be genetically called by our ancestors. … Just as it is ridiculous for a modern person living in Sweden or Norway to claim an American cannot hear the voices of his Nordic ancestors, it would be equally ridiculous for me as someone who is presumably completely of European descent, to claim that someone who is half European descent, cannot hear the voices inside him of his ancestors.” (From the American Viking website, in the “Havamalism” section)
Gotta say doesn’t exactly sound like a neo-Nazi. Seems pretty open, in fact.
But surely you’re not surprised by hypocrisy and outright lying when it comes from the SJW’s?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Clearly we vehemently disagree on this and a number of other issues. I am not going to try to persuade you otherwise but I am curious. Do you follow my blog for other things I post or to keep up with an opposing point of view?
Thank you.
LikeLike
bit of both, actually.
you do post interesting content now and then (maybe more now than then, i’m terrible at keeping up with blogs). But also for opposing view stuff. I don’t believe in echo chambers, and it’s always nice to see what “the other side” is going on about as well as challenge my own views with others.
LikeLike
FWIW, I follow “Facing the Fires Within” for much the same reasons, even though I don’t think i’ve made a specific reply on my own blog. You do have an interesting post now and again, and I am never above agreeing with someone on a particular issue simply because they might disagree with me on 90% of the other issues.
LikeLike
I do not believe you have, no. But, to be fair, I never commented on yours either. 😉
LikeLike
That seems reasonable. Yeah, I have to remember to check these once in a while too.
LikeLike