Tags
So I finally get to write something Helish. Which, normally makes me happy. I…tend to get distracted which leaves me not putting as much of the Hel’s teachings and ways out there. Admittedly, these ways are mostly for the dead, but still.
Unfortunately, our journey into the Eternal Realm is not for joyious reasons, or even respectful ones, but rather because I rather feel like choking a bitch. Several bitches, actually. And I’m having to reach across the proverbial afterlife and smack some people who, typically, I don’t have to worry about pulling these types of shenanigans. I’m talking about the Satanists.
Satanic Temple slams new Texas fetus burial rule opposed by Pro-Choice groups
Yep, you read that right. Apparently the Satanists are joining up with pro-choice groups because they don’t like what’s supposed to happen to the aborted child after it has been sliced, diced, burned, and removed.
Abortion rights activists may have found an unlikely ally in the Satanic Temple, which has vowed to oppose a new Texas state rule requiring fetal tissue be given a burial or cremation.
In this case, the fact that the aborted, unborn child is now apparently to be given a proper burial, or at least a cremation.
That’s right, giving the Dead a proper burial is now grounds to scream and protest by Satanists and Pro-Choice advocates.
No rights are being violated. No abortions are being prevented. The only thing that is changing is that the dead are being given a burial!
In two weeks, a new state rule on medical waste will take effect in Texas, meaning aborted fetal tissue must undergo “interment.”
From December 18, Texas hospitals and abortion clinics will no longer be permitted to place fetal tissue in sanitary landfills and instead will have to organize a burial of sorts. Although not an official law, the rule could be used to guide court procedures.
That’s right, instead of throwing the dead into a landfill…clinics in Texas will have to provide the dead with a respectful internment.
My Gods, the horrors. You end the lives of numberless unborn and now instead of throwing them in garbage bags you actually have to bury or burn them like you would a normal person. So oppressive! So inhumane!
The Satanic Temple, which uses Satan as a symbol to promote secularism, has now denounced the rule for enforcing a “well-established component of religious practice.”
That’s right, a religious organization is…protesting religious practice. But let’s look at their statement, shall we?
TEXAS RULE ON FETAL REMAINS THE SATANIC TEMPLE RELIGIOUS DEFENSE OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS The Texas Department of Health and Human Services plans to enforce new rules that require that fetal tissue must be buried or cremated and can no longer be disposed of in sanitary landfills as they are in every other state. The Satanic Temple believes burial rites are a well-established component of religious practice…
Oh no, religions everywhere bury their dead. That means burial of the dead is religious in nature! Because burial has been a part of human existance since the dawn of time, in different forms and rites.
But so the fuck what? So what is burying the dead is “a component of religious practice?” What does that even matter in this issue? Is the Satanic Temple really going to stand there and scream about how it’s wrong to not throw aborted babies into landfills? How, rather, that is the morally acceptable action, as opposed to burial or cremation!?
…The Satanic Temple believes burial rites are a well-established component of religious practice. This is undisputed in the entirety of US legal history. In addition, members of The Satanic Temple believe in the inviolability of the body and, as such, these rules contradict our fundamental beliefs. The First Amendment protects our right to practice our beliefs, and under the Religious Freedom Reform Act (RFRA), the State must present a compelling reason for why they want to enforce rules that inhibit adherence to our religious practices…
Inviolable
Meaning: prohibiting violation; secure from destruction, violence, infringement, or desecration
So wait, if the Satanic Temple really means it when they say they believe the boy is inviolable, THEN HOW THE FUCK ARE THEY SUPPORTING ABORTION? I myself am rather Pro-Choice, but even I admit that an abortion is a violation, a destructive violence against the unborn life, an infringement on it’s very right to exist, and a desecration of the sanctity of life.
And they want to claim that throwing the sliced up remains of an unborn child’s body is not a violation of this “Principle of Inviolability?” That it is not a destructive, violation, violent, infringing desecration?
So please, will someone clarify how this position is not a complete piece of hypocritical, and heretical, piece of bullshit!
Because I’m pretty sure mass graves/landfills for bodies are a god damn violation of human “inviolability” and even their rights!

One of the mass graves at Belsen concentration camp.
BU 3741
Part of
WAR OFFICE SECOND WORLD WAR OFFICIAL COLLECTION
Malindine E G (Capt)
No 5 Army Film and Photographic Unit
Or maybe they’re going with the second definition of Inviolability: incapable of being violated; incorruptible; unassailable. In which case they believe that nothing done to the human body is disrespectful, violent, destructive, etc.
In which case I have a few questions for these Satanist regarding Rape, Mass Murder, Mass graves, torture, etc.
Because apparently they feel that tossing human remains in the garbage after you slice them up or burn them alive with acid is perfectly, morally acceptable!
Actually, that appears to be exactly it. They say the human body is inviolable. Which means that they acknowledge the Unborn as Human. Which means the Satanists here find it perfectly acceptable to kill defenseless Humans who are Trapped in Inescapable Places, by carving them up alive, and then toss Human Remains in a Landfill.
Perhaps these Satanists would be willing to uphold this theological doctrine for themselves. I could use some building materials for a shrine to Hela.
…Clearly, the State of Texas has no compelling reason because these rules were not enacted to promote health and safety, but rather to harass and burden women who terminate their pregnancies…
Really? It is harassment and a burden to these women that they might have to pay the clinic (or funeral home) a fee to properly dispose of the unborn human they have just had executed.
I mean sure, this might not have been enacted to promote health and safety, but I would certainly consider it a PROMOTION OF HUMAN DIGNITY!
Now, I could give you that this would be a “burden,” but burdening someone with the consequences of their actions is part of life. The dead deserve a proper burial, regardless of who they are. Especially if they are an innocent.
But is this Harassment? Honestly, I don’t care if it is. If you want the right to kill your unborn child, fine, you can have it. But that child deserves a burial of some fashion. Not to be tossed out like the bloody remains of yesterday’s pork dinner. You had sex. You did not use protection. You got pregnant. And you decided to abort. Or you got raped and pregnant, and decided to abort. I don’t care. The child dying by your command in innocent, had no say, had no choice, the least you can do is give it a proper burial if you will give it absolutely nothing else in its life…
AND IF THAT IS HARASSMENT THEN YOU DESERVE IT!
There is a reason we bury the dead. It is out of respect for the person they were, or that they could have been. It it is also to appease the spirit of that person. And frankly I have heard tale of enough people haunted by their aborted child in one form or another that those spirits should be treated the same as any other and given a proper end.
NOT TREATED LIKE GARBAGE!
…For these reasons, members of The Satanic Temple are not required to comply with the Texas rule on fetal remains. Nevertheless, we will require legal support to protect the rights of our members. Read more at thesatanictemple.com and religiousreproductiverights.com #thesatanictemple #religiousreproductiverights
Well, I’m so happy to see that the Satanists are such paragons of human decency and respect. I am so happy that their religion allows them to slaughter the defenceless and toss their bodies into unmarked mass graves along with all sorts of other “medical” garbage.
I am so glad that they do not appear to feel any need to respect the dead, the helpless, the butchered. That to their religion what is done to a person against their will and the flagrant violation of their bodies afterwards is of no consequence.
Now, maybe I am biased because my religious path is of the Dead, and the Dishonored Dead at that. And few count among the dishonored dead more than aborted children, who were given no honor or respect during their brief and painfully ended existences. Who are tossed in the garbage like so much rotten meat, for the selfish whims entitled and self righteous beings who give no thought beyond their own personal comforts and pleasures. Who are denied even the most basic of human rights.
Women have the right to kill their unborn. The least we can give the unborn is the right to a burial.
So quite frankly, all I can give to the Satanic Temple at this point is a giant FUCK YOU.
I think the reason the Texas DHHS is trying to enact this is to avoid the fetal tissue trafficking that Planned Parenthood was engaging in that James O’Keefe’s people exposed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lucius, this brings back to me the 3 early miscarriages I had after the tragedy of my first pregnancy. There was NOTHING there. The third miscarriage was as a result of a “BLIGHTED OVUM.” That’s right. There was no fetus growing in the fetal sack at all. GODS DAMN IT, Lucius, you do NOT know how our ancestors handled such things as miscarriage. Our ancestors also practiced family planning. (I was a History major, too.) You do not know how individual women today handle miscarriage or the tragedy of therapeutic abortion. It is the land of The Leviathan out there as I am sure you know. It would certainly be the height of selfishness to bring in anyone who is known to be a drain on resources into this brave new world. So, don’t be a hypocrite now and start to cry. I carry the lamp and I am still trying to find an honest person. (Remember, I am a retired medical librarian, so I have read the literature.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am sorry for your loss.
But if there is nothing there…then there is nothing to bury. But if there is something there, then it can and should be buried. To honor the soul that has passed on to death.
This is not about how our ancestors handled miscarriages. this is not about how they handled family planning. This is not even about family planning. This is about allowing the dead to be buried rather than tossed in the garbage. And personally, I do not care if this is the land of Eden or the land of the Leviathan, I do not care if it is the height of selfishness to bring someone into this world and noble to kill them before they enter it.
I am not being a hypocrite. I am of Hela’s realm, and my concern is the Dead. That they are respected and honored as they should be. To, when time needs, speak on behalf of the Dishonored Dead. It is not hypocrisy to insist that those that are dead receive the respectful rites, regardless of who they are or what age they were if they died. It is not hypocrisy to believe that a mother who kills (actually kills, not miscarries) her child in her womb owes that child the proper rites. And it is not hypocrisy under the theology of Hela to insist that the dead not be tossed into garbage piles!
So if you still think I am being a hypocrite, illuminate for me why that is. But you want an honest person, you will find few more honest than we dead.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Since I’m pretty sure that our ancestors practiced a variety of methods of removing unwanted or untenable pregnancies, you’re going to have to try a bit harder to convince me that abortion is inherently evil since, despite your insistence that you only care about the Dead, you’ve got an obvious agenda there. I’m still trying to figure out if this bias is because you actually think abortion is evil or because you have a knee-jerk reaction against anything connected with the left-leaning side of politics. You seem to be one of the very, very few people I’ve ever met (virtually or in meatspace) that thinks that all abortion is inherently wrong. I’ve never met anyone in person or in virtuality who believed that all abortions at any stage of development should be readily available for any or no reason. As near as I can tell, a majority of humans in this society strongly support the idea that abortion needs to remain a professional medical option for dangerously complicated pregnancies, with the understanding that a social situation *can* qualify as dangerously complicated. This same majority also seems to support the idea that the base problem is a total failure to impart working understanding of human reproduction and contraception. You want to get angry, get angry at the people treating abortion like some sort of retro-active contraceptive.
Plus, you missed a major point in the first quote. The Satanic Temple is an organization using the word ‘Temple’ ironically while promoting pure secularization. The ‘hypocrite’ section of your tirade is invalid.
LikeLike
Okay. I’m going to try and respond to this as best I can.
I do not think abortion is inherently wrong. I’ve said it in this article and previous ones, that I am actually pro-choice. My issue is not, in and of itself, with Abortion. It doesn’t even have anything to do with “left-leaning politics.”
My issue is with how it’s treated.
If the unborn child was acknowledged as a Human Being, most of my problems with abortion would actually go away. My second largest issue with abortion is that so much of it, the arguments for it, and the discussion around it, is about dehumanizing the unborn child. It allows people to convince themselves that they are not killing another human being, sometimes for purely selfish reasons. I find this sickening. I don’t mind if you kill someone, I mind if you dehumanize them and lie about them in order to get away with it. Especially if those lies are purely told to make oneself feel better about one’s actions.
To me, dishonoring those you kill is inherently wrong.
Our ancestors practiced family planning. Our ancestors also killed each other openly according to honor. They did not lie about the humanity of those they killed, merely accepted that sometimes it was needed to kill others.
So if I have an agenda regarding Abortion, that agenda is my issue with the hypocrisy and dehumanization…not the practice and the killing. As I said, I speak on behalf of Hela for the “Dishonored” i.e. “Those who are not honored.” Death comes to everyone, even the unborn. There is no sorrow that they die. But there is anger that the dead are dishonored for the pleasure and comfort of the living. Be this dehumanizing them to make them easier to kill, or denying them funeral rites after they have been slain.
And I don’t care that the Satanic Temple is an “ironic temple.” If I was to go out and kill dozens of people, but claim I was doing it “ironically” i would still be committing mass murder. Regardless of their “irony” they have placed themselves up as a Temple of Satanic worship, distributing Satanic theology and dogma, however “ironically.” And if their talk of the inviolability of the human body was Ironic, well…I think that says more about them than it invalidates any claims of hypocrisy I made about them and their position. Either way, they claim nobility while supporting ignobility. Which, I believe, is considered hypocrisy.
LikeLike
Your clarification about your views on abortion I can respect. I, too, would prefer more a more human dialogue regarding what must be a terrible decision for some, as opposed to the dehumanizing rhetoric we hear now. I stand by my second comment, however. I still think you’ve chosen to fuss (because it really sounds like fussing or scolding… sorry) at them for something that isn’t actually there. They remain utterly convinced that the body of the adult woman involved completely trumps what they see as hypothetical rights for a growing mass of tissue that can not yet survive on its own, and see this belief as the scientifically informed secular value that they wish to promote. The issue here is not that they are being hypocrites but that they might simply be wrong.
LikeLike
Well, I am scolding.
LikeLike
You wrote: “Death comes to everyone, even the unborn. There is no sorrow that they die. But there is anger that the dead are dishonored for the pleasure and comfort of the living. Be this dehumanizing them to make them easier to kill, or denying them funeral rites after they have been slain.”
I do not think that this is true. As far as I know (a number of women I personally know, personal recollections, etc.), this decision was NOT easy and it was especially painful when it was done in order to eliminate the pain and suffering of a much wanted child who would die of genetic and virus induced diseases. I had severe pre-eclamsia at the end of my second tri-mester and HELLP syndrome. I had two major abdominal operations within three days. Eight days later I had to make the decision to turn off her respirator. I have the ashes of my daughter; however, I have nothing from the three spontaneous abortions (this is the medical name for a miscarriage). You can see how a Yahoo from Texas can take things out of context very quickly. Our ancestors didn’t do that I am sorry to say. The pain has been with me for 26 years. I have no one to remember me into the future. No one will spill libations to me. My family line dies with me.
LikeLike
As someone interested in cultural and religious theology surrounding death I was wondering what you think about the Ask a Mortician Youtube channel and the org she is part of called Order of the Good Death.
LikeLike
i’ve not heard of this, but will check it out. thank you
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh the “Satanists” in the article you quoted are actually atheists. I get sick of these LeVeyan edgelords claiming the title Satanist so the actual, theistic Satanists have to specify that they are theistic Satanists.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Coming from a Texan, I heard about the law and was really happy about it. You can get rid of your unborn child all you want, but at least acknowledge they were a living thing and bury them. People whining on about the law just come off as annoying at best. If you can pay for an abortion (they don’t come cheap), you can pay the fee to bury the child after.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Ah, I’m from Texas, so I’ve an idea what recent law you’re talking about. Sadly there is only ONE entity in all of Texas that would take and bury an aborted child from a clinic, to the tune of such expense, that it threatens the ability of these clinics to operate – it’s a backdoor way to shut the clinics down. The woman using these clinics don’t HAVE $5,000-$20,000 to do a burial themselves – so it’s a backdoor way to keep the poor from having access to the same level of choice. What should have been built into the law was the responsibility of the state to provide paupers graves for all abortion clinics when the woman using their services chooses not to do something themselves, or for _all_ funeral homes/graveyards to accept these for a very low rate as an act of charity to the community. I applaud the concept of honor that helped get it through, and abhor the lack of forethought or backdoor politics that it allows.
LikeLiked by 1 person
in regards to this, there is a place called “The Order of The Good Death” which has provided some info on this I may put here on my blog. Apparently, in the Texas instance, a medical crematory (which I’m led to believe is something these clinics can get access too if they don’t already possess one) is an acceptable form of cremation/disposal and multiple aborted can be cremated at the same time. Not funeral homes, or even official graveyards will be required…for good or ill. So this “Backdoor” expense you mention may not be the case in most instances. Still, it is a concern, I suppose, that will need further investigation.
LikeLike